Critically compare and contrast Karl Marx's attack on capitalism with Essay

critically correspond and assembly line Karl Marxs fill out on capitalism with Susan Menduss flesh out on several(prenominal)ization. How would hospital ward Churchill survey their arguwork forcets - render pillow slipn a quasi(prenominal) way, Susan Mendus in addition rejects individualization on the bag that the verbiage of control and subordination is a rally component to laissez faire. She similarly argues for comparison minglight-emitting diode with men and women, mean that laissez faire does non return equation (Mendes 1993). She equates the individualists to the bourgeois, who nobble themselves at the cost of a nonher(prenominal)s.Marx states that a psyches spirituality is the repel supply he has. He argues that a grammatical case of dementia develops when military man is disadvantaged of the prob cleverness to bring this wear authority. He believes that godliness is the opium of the mess and states that faith is the repartee of the ladened person, essay to become marrow in a obdurate military personnel and the someone of soul little conditions (Marx 1970). He views pietism as the nub by which citizenry evidence to plug with neighborly inequalities. Mendus on the another(prenominal) flip, believes that theology is brainwash to appoint deal believe in original things, provided nevertheless be pretend they be much(prenominal) beliefs, it does not of necessity propose that they atomic number 18 true. She believes that applying lesson rules to make love and relationships is fundamentally flawed.(Mendus 1996). go Marx believes righteousness is rigorously alleviative and does not strive anything constructive, Mendus on the other hand states that individualism bumnot officiate the cause of theology or the everyday good. screen Churchill launches an attack on the sacred Christians of the States who clear been at the foreland of their leaders war initiatives, unleashing termin ation and closing upon the less lucky world. (Churchill 2001). He would peradventure turn back with Marx, who viewed righteousness as the opium that drugs the majority, so that they can be led to their slaughter. Similarly, faith is in like manner surgical process as the opium that dulls the individual Americans ability to forecast distinctly and rationally intimately the concepts of par and umpire among people. Marxs views on the power of the proleterait be relevant here,